While watching the Tour de France  last night, I couldn't help but notice the negativity of the English  commentator's remarks about windmills. I find these modernistic  additions to the French countryside totally in keeping with the beauty  of the fields, rivers and forests that backgrounded the presence of  these sustainable producers of electricity. He seemed to think that they  were a blot on the landscape. I'm certain that most French people at  least would disagree.
Let's  take a step back from these controversial machines and look at them  from the perspective of someone whose perception is yet to be befuddled  by the vagaries of time, eg, a child's perspective. In the middle of a  field is a substantial white pole grounded on to a concrete foundation  in the middle of a field. The three blades are formed with precision and  rotate with unnerving precision and silence. To be sure, these devices  are large and imposing, but seem to operate with grace and ease, with  minimal sensuous interference in the way of noise, unsightliness, smell  and are of seemingly little or no danger to animal or man.
So  what's the fuss? Why do some people insist on objecting to this  progressive development of technology? Surely compared to the  alternative here we have an attractive if minor contributor to the  energy needs of a modern society with it's great cities and urban  populations. Compared with the alternative, coal-fired, nuclear or gas  generated plants, these modern variants of an ancient theme seem to be  infinitely preferable.
At various times I have come across several types of power generators.  My first experience was while driving in the La Trobe Valley east of  Melbourne. There, electricity has been generated by brown coal fired  generators for over half a century. My first impression was one of being  overwhelmed by the magnificence of this huge plane, with coal being  ripped from the adjoining open-cut mine. Strangely beautiful until one  is confronted by the intensity of the noise generated as a by product,  the scarring of the landscape, a feeling that one was in the presence of  a power much greater than myself. It was almost like a homage to an  idol of modernity.
I had similarly ambivalent feeling towards the nuclear reactors  that I saw in the countryside and cities of both Switzerland and  France. A strange mixture of beauty and ugliness that is somehow  overwhelming. The ugliness is intensified only when one becomes aware of  the by products of these relatively calm constructions. This repulsion  is an afterimage only available to me once I consider that the waste  material is highly active, burning and poisonous for many years after  wards. Only once I realise that these devices produce such intractable  danger and are really a front for weapons production in any case, does  the beauty of these constructions diminish.
Hydro electricity is another case in point. The Snowy Mountains Hydro-electric plant is built in the Australian Alps,  taking advantage of the kinetic energy of the snow that falls there  over winter. The building of this a scheme has a legendary aspect in  Australian culture as it employed so many male immigrants and gave rise  to many marriages between these newcomers and the peoples of the  surrounding districts. It was the harnessing of this human resource  which ultimately made the harnessing of the power residing latent in the  natural resource available to all.
Still,  the intensity of the construction in the natural domain is quite  dominant. The concentration of such a large plant detracts in a sense  while adding to it. The whole area has been transformed into a built  human environment. I don't mind this, but still, the magnitude of this  project unbalances the subtleties of nature. Nevertheless, it still  remains preferable to the previous examples in all impacts upon the  senses. It is just, simply put, aesthetically a better choice.
While  I was in the south of France holidaying with my then partner and our  son, I was curious to see the windgenerators that had been recently  built in the area. I noticed them in the distance and drove up and down  country lanes in an effort to get as close as we could. From every angle  they rose majestically above the bare undulating hills of the region. 
When  we finally manage to stop the car close enough to appreciate these  splendid machines, spinning slowly in the breeze emanating from the  Mediterranean, we all stood in silence in the field with the blades  peacefully rotating with nothing but the gentlest of low frequency  sounds, in harmony with the impact that these machines had on the  surrounding landscape and environment: minimal.
So,  what exactly was this modern day Don Quixote tilting at? The windmills  before him in his immediate field of vision, or some romantic notion of  nature inside his head, where human activity is forbidden. An idealistic  Garden of Eden that ensures the continuing destruction of the  environment elsewhere, a peaceful solution or another bomb factory?
Human  society is always faced with choices in how to proceed. As Hegel  correctly noted, for every human act there is both intended as well as  unintended consequences. Modern society requires electricity generation  to ensure its survival. Life without it for the greater than six billion  inhabitants of the world is well nigh near impossible without any sort  of major conflict or catastrophe. Surely it is time to get the windmills  out of our heads and into reality along with other renewable forms of  generation capacity.
The  change over from out-moded forms to the newer and sustainable forms is a  chance for great economic expansion and development in the next fifty  or so years, an opportunity to reclaim landscapes lost to the barbarity  of early forms of electricity generation, making way for a peaceable,  quiet and gainfully employed world, and an end to the over  centralization of society in general. 
Previous  forms may have promised something like this, but can now be seen as  having been an aberration in the direction of the human environmental  interface. Hopefully, we are moving into a sustainable, democratic and  peaceful  future with an environmental balance in which human social  development  and conservation of nature can live side by side. 
Related articles by Zemanta
- Does it really matter? (pdjonesonline.blogspot.com)
 - Innovation Powers Growth of Small Wind on Urban Rooftops (worldchanging.com)
 - Power generation through Thar coal by next year (teabreak.pk)
 - Solar wells displacing windmills on Western range (msnbc.msn.com)
 - How to Increase Windmill Efficiency (brighthub.com)
 - The real green solution: Tax the bad stuff (money.cnn.com)
 - How Electricity is Generated (brighthub.com)
 

No comments:
Post a Comment